Posts Tagged ‘Home Birth’

Midwife Scope of Practice Draft Proposal

January 11th, 2013

Our next Midwifery Scope of Practice Advisory Committee meeting will be Monday (January 14th) from 6-8 pm in the Lab conference room.  The Agenda is packed with 2 full hours of information and discussion.  We’ll be reviewing data from other states, and what scopes of practice they allow, as well as reviewing our own data collected from the midwives’ quarterly reports along with data from AZ birth certificates.  This data will give us a better picture of how many Arizona home deliveries had successful outcomes, and how many required transfer to a hospital for delivery or complications.  Two of our advisory committee members will be providing a presentation on a successful midwifery home birth model from the State of Washington, called Smooth Transitions

We’ll also be going over some interim draft regulations (for discussion purposes) that would allow licensed midwives to (under certain circumstances) attend a delivery at home even if the mom is carrying twins, if their baby is in a breech position, and when the mom has had a previous Caesarian-section (also known as vaginal birth after cesarean, or VBAC).  For example a midwife could attend a birth at home even if the mom has had a previous C-section if she’s:  1) had a successful vaginal birth since their last C-section; or 2) it’s been more than 18 months since the last C-section and she had a low transverse incision and an ultrasound that shows the placenta in the right place and growing normally. 

Because there are higher risks with these types of deliveries…  the draft language has certain conditions.  For example, the language asks: 1)  midwives to develop an emergency action plan for patients with one of these conditions; 2) the patient is to meet with an OB/Gyn to discuss the risks, adverse outcomes, benefits and alternatives of a home birth for their condition (this is known as obtaining informed consent); and 3) midwives to send the patient’s medical records to the hospital listed in the emergency action plan at 32 weeks. Once the patient goes into labor, the midwife would need to call the hospital to let them know her patient is in labor, and then again after the baby is born or if the mother needs to be transferred for delivery or a complication. 

Getting ready for this high-profile meeting has been an effort of teamwork from almost every part of the agency.  Thanks to staff from IT (Jennifer Tweedy, Gannon Wegner, and Jesse Lewis) and Preparedness (Paul Barbeau, Tim Singleton and Steven Becker) for setting up the meeting so that it can be viewed on Livestream.  Fernando Ortega in Facilities has been instrumental in coordinating for after-hours security and parking.  Also, thanks go out to Kristin Feelemyer, Shoana Anderson, and Khaleel Hussaini for developing a special database that we’re using to mine our data.  Also, thanks to the Rules and Administrative Counsel team (Patti Cordova and Teresa Koehler) for working hard to provide draft rule packages language for the committee to review, as well as researching other states and their rules and regulations for licensed midwives. 

This is just one of many examples of the team work and collaboration within our Department.  It’ll result in an evidenced based decision that will hopefully improve birthing experiences and outcomes for patients that want to have a planned at-home birth.

Using Evidence to Reach Consensus

December 11th, 2012

Some of you might remember a protest about a year ago in front of our 150 Building.  About 100 folks were carrying placards asking us to make it easier to have a home-birth in AZ.  They were mostly young families and some licensed midwives- and they were urging us to change our licensing rules for midwives.  That day last December, I met with 2 representatives from the group and set up a roadmap to work out the issues.  We set up a dialog so we could come up with a solution together and the Stakeholder team shepherded a bill through the process that will help us solve some of the issues they were concerned about.  The bill gave us exempt rulemaking authority to overhaul our rules for licensing AZ midwives and set up an advisory committee to help us with the decision-making.

We had our first advisory committee meeting last week.  While we made some progress- we didn’t make as much as I would have liked.  We’ll be making modifications to the procedures at the next meeting, which will be held on Monday, December 17 from 2 to 4 p.m. in the basement of the 1740 W. Adams building.  I’ll be co-chairing the future meetings with Dr. Cara Christ.  The meeting notices and minutes will be posted on this website

We’ve been asked by consumers to consider changing the scope of practice for midwives to allow them to attend vaginal births after a previous cesarean, breech (feet first) presentation, and delivering twins, among other things.  These are currently considered out of the scope of practice for midwives.  It was clear at our first committee meeting that there’s currently little consensus among the Stakeholders (obstetricians, midwives and consumers) about whether the scope of practice for midwives should be expanded to include these types of things. 

I still have hope that we can come up with a set of final regulations that all sides can live with… but getting there will require a review of the scientific literature regarding the safety and risks of home births attended by midwives.  That’s why we’ve asked the U of A’s College of Public Health to conduct a review of the scientific literature regarding the relative risks of vaginal births after cesarean, breech (feet first) presentation, and delivering twins at home.  They’ll begin work shortly on a scientific literature review and provide us with an analysis in early 2013.  By using scientific evidence I’m hoping we’ll find some common ground.

 

Midwifery & the Democratic Process

March 28th, 2012

Here’s a short story about using the democratic process to get things done.  Some of you might remember a protest last December in front of our 150 Building.  About 100 folks or so were carrying placards in front of our building asking us to make it easier to have a home-birth in AZ. 

Many of you probably didn’t know that ADHS licenses 60 Midwives who practice in Arizona.  Our licensing rules for Midwives were last revised in the mid 1990’s and are out of date; the application is too complicated.  That day last December, Colby Bower and I met with 2 community folks, Allyson Fernstrom and Sarah Macklin, and 2 midwives including Connie Canada, during the demonstration- and we had a productive discussion.  We set up a dialog so we could come up with a solution together.  Allyson and Sarah followed through with flying colors, built an effective coalition, worked with our team (Colby and Rohno Geppert) and the state legislature- and shepherded a bill through the process that will go a long way toward solving some of the issues they were concerned about. 

The Governor signed the bill yesterday- providing us with exempt rulemaking authority to overhaul our rules for licensing AZ Midwives and setting up an advisory committee and process to review the official “Scope of Practice” for AZ Midwives.  You can check out the final bill online. We’ll also have some information up on our Midwife website shortly that will highlight where we go from here.

It just goes to show you that the democratic process works…  that ordinary folks, like Allyson and Sarah, can get together, organize, and petition their government and elected officials to get things done.  The key is working within the process, staying involved, and applying the most important skill anybody can have- working well with others (the most important grade any of us get in our academic career).  Well done all.

P.S. There was a study published in the British Medical Journal recently suggesting that there’s little difference in complications among the babies of women with low-risk pregnancies who delivered in hospitals vs. those who gave birth at home with a midwife.  Of course- the article is more complicated than that- so visit the journal website.

Home Birth Protest

December 6th, 2011

Those of you that were working at our downtown campus last Wednesday afternoon may have seen the 100 or so folks carrying placards in front of our 150 Building.  They were asking us to make it easier to have a home-birth in AZ.  How can we do that, you ask? 

Many of you probably didn’t know that we license the 50 or so Midwives that practice in Arizona.  Our licensing rules for Midwives were last revised in the mid 1990’s, our rules are out of date, and the application is too complicated.  I met with 4 of the community folks upstairs during the demonstration- and we had a productive discussion.  Basically- they asked us to consider revising our Midwife licensing rules to simplify the application process and consider revising their scope of practice.  We talked during our meeting about the rulemaking process (both exempt and regular), gave them a realistic forecast of how quickly we could revise the rules using each approach, and set up a dialog so we could come up with a solution together. 

Coincidently- there was a study published in the British Medical Journal this week regarding the safety etc. of home births. The study basically suggests that there’s little difference in complications among the babies of women with low-risk pregnancies who delivered in hospitals vs. those who gave birth at home with a midwife.  Of course- the article is more complicated than that- so visit the journal article for more info…