Posts Tagged ‘healthcare-associated infections’

To Decolonize, or Not to Decolonize

June 5th, 2013

…  that is the question- at least when it comes to whether to take standard measures to decolonize intensive care patients with antibiotic ointments in their nose to remove Staphylococcus bugs.  Hospital associated infections are a critical public health and healthcare cost problem.  While we’re losing ground in our fight against obesity- we’re making progress toward reducing healthcare associated infections both here in AZ and across the country. 

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine this week found that that “universal decolonization” of intensive care patients can reduce MRSA infections by up to 37% and other  bloodstream infections by 44%.  This was a big study (about 74,000 patients in 43 hospitals), meaning that these results carry a fair amount of statistical weight.  This study will provide additional information to the infectious disease practitioners in AZ as they craft and implement hospital infection control plans. 

We’re making it a priority to prevent hospital associated infections by maintaining our HAI Program and by licensing and inspecting healthcare facilities across the state.  We also facilitate a multidisciplinary HAI Advisory Committee that identifies and addresses priority areas for Arizona.  This dedicated group of partners has collaborated continuously since 2009 to coordinate prevention efforts across the state. The partnerships and open dialogue help us improve surveillance, report and prevent hospital associated infections, which support our Strategic Map goal of reducing healthcare associated infections and re-admissions.

Preventing Hospital Associated Infections in AZ: New Performance Data

February 15th, 2013

A new CDC report released this week gave a status update on the national Winnable Battle to reduce hospital associated infections.   Not all medical procedures carry the same risk of infection, so the report uses something called a standardized infection ratio to compare infection rates among hospitals. It’s a complicated statistic, but basically, it divides the number of infections that actually occurred in a hospital with the number of infections that were expected in the same time period.  The lower the score the better.  

Arizona’s 2011 overall score was less than 1… meaning we did well.  Our overall average (2011) score was 0.575, which was better than expected for Arizona, and better than the national average score of 0.592. The report also shows a decrease in scores since 2010, meaning that the work Arizona hospitals are doing to decrease infections and make care safer for their patients is making a difference. If you’re interested in seeing the score for your local hospital, you can check it out on Hospital Compare. Right now, this site only shows CLABSI scores, but it’ll soon display scores for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and some surgical site infections. 

We’re making it a priority to prevent hospital associated infections by maintaining our HAI Program and licensing and inspecting healthcare facilities across the state.  We also facilitate a multidisciplinary HAI Advisory Committee that identifies and addresses priority areas for Arizona. This dedicated group of partners has collaborated continuously since 2009 to coordinate prevention efforts across the state. The partnerships and open dialogue help us improve surveillance, report and prevent hospital associated infections, which support our Strategic Map goal of reducing healthcare associated infections and re-admissions.

Preventing Healthcare Associated Infections: An AZ Winnable Battle

January 4th, 2013

Healthcare-associated infections are a critical public health challenge in Arizona and in the US. Healthcare associated infections (HAIs) are acquired during healthcare treatment and can be devastating and even deadly- and they’re largely preventable. You may have seen the article in last week’s Republic about dirty needles and their link to transmission of viruses and drug-resistant superbugs. The article mentions a recent Arizona incident in which unsafe injection practices at a pain management clinic- which had been investigated by our disease detectives in AZ’s public health system and summarized in an MMWR article last Summer.

Arizona’s public health system takes a layered approach to preventing HAI’s in our state.  It starts with our Licensing team- who regulates the healthcare institutions where care is given.  Our regulations set the standards that prevent infections and our teams of surveyors do routine checks and complaint investigations to make sure facilities are in compliance with our standards.  We already have solid infection control regulations for hospitals and nursing homes…  but our current Rulemaking for healthcare institutions will be establishing new infection control standards across the board that’ll be applied consistently across all health care institutions in the second half of 2013.

At another level, our Medical Facilities Licensing team and our HAI Program collaborate to ensure the safety of patients in Arizona by jointly providing technical assistance and guidance to licensed healthcare facilities in response to identified infection control breaches. Through our HAI Program and our HAI Advisory Committee- we generate guidance documents for all healthcare facilities and promote best practices for infection control and injection safety like materials produced through the CDC’s One and Only Campaign and our No Place Like Home initiative which is Arizona’s approach to the national Partnership for Patients: Better Care, Lower Costs project.

The next layer is our network of public health disease detectives.  Our Healthcare-Associated Infections Program and the counties conduct  epidemiologic investigations when we get reports of unsafe injection practices affecting multiple patients. For example…  last year we investigated 3 separate instances of unsafe injection practices- exposing 327 people to disease and resulting in 3 infections.  Each of the investigations identified unsafe injection practices like: 1) Re-inserting a used syringe into a medication vial; 2) Using a single-dose vial for more than one patient; 3) Diluting medicine beyond the manufacturer’s recommendations; 4) Improper use of personal protective equipment prior to spinal/lumbar injections; and 5)  Illegal contamination of needles/syringes and injectable reagents.

Many of the gaps in infection control have roots at the national level.  A national drug shortage on many reagents and medications (including appropriate concentrations and single-use vial sizes) has compelled some healthcare practitioners to search for alternate solutions to ensure availability and to use medications as economically as possible. Some practices, like using single-dose vials for multiple patients, may be considered an industry standard in some fields and may still be taught and practiced, despite CDC injection safety guidelines inclusion in Standard Precautions since 2007. Many of these challenges can be safely addressed through medication repackaging into single-dose vials by a licensed compounding pharmacy appropriately applying the U.S. Pharmacopeia standards.

In short- healthcare associated infections remain a public health problem nationally and in Arizona- but by continuing to effectively use our licensing survey teams, effectively using the network of disease detectives we have in our county and state public health system, and by leveraging the work of our HAI Advisory Committee, the One and Only Campaign, and Arizona’s No Place Like Home Initiative- preventing healthcare associated infections remains a Winnable Battle.

 

Hospital Bloodstream Infection Rates Go Online

February 23rd, 2012

Bloodstream infections that start because of a “central line” in a person’s body are among the most serious of all healthcare-associated infections- causing thousands of deaths each year and about $700M in added costs.  The CDC estimates that there were about 41,000 infections like these U.S. hospitals last year…  and 25% percent of patients who get a central line associated bloodstream infection will die from it.  Each patient with an infection like this costs about $17K extra to boot. 

As is the case with everything in public health, measuring and reporting rates of central line associated bloodstream infections (called CLABSIs) is a key ingredient in developing effective interventions to reduce these deadly and expensive (and often preventable) infections.  To that end, this week Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services added data about how often these preventable infections occur in hospital intensive care units across the country to their Hospital Compare website.  Providing data that will help hospitals and the public health system to bring down these rates, saving thousands of lives and millions of dollars each year.  

The data on the website comes from data reported from hospital ICUs to CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).  In many places, this is the first time consumers can see how well their local hospitals prevent CLABSIs, one of the most deadly healthcare-associated infections.  You can also read more and join the conversation at http://blogs.cdc.gov/safehealthcare/

Hospital Compare also provides a host of additional indicators about the quality of care provided in over 4,700 of America’s acute-care, critical access and children’s hospitals.  The website features free, easy-to-use information about these hospitals, including mortality and readmission rates for each, along with 10 measures that capture patient experience with hospital care, 17 measures that assess patient safety at each hospital, 25 process-of-care measures and three children’s asthma care measures.

New Healthcare Associated Infections Toolkit

April 15th, 2011

Healthcare-associated infections are a critical challenge to public health in Arizona.  Healthcare associated infections are acquired during healthcare treatment and can be devastating and even deadly- importantly, they’re preventable.  At any given time, about 1 in 20 patients have an infection while receiving healthcare treatment in U.S. hospitals, causing up to $33B in excess medical costs every year.  For example, a single central-line associated bloodstream infection can result in an estimated $16,550 in excess medical costs. The Association of State and Territorial Health Officials recently developed a handy new toolkit called “Eliminating Healthcare Associated Infections: State Policy Options” which provides ways to use legal and policy interventions as tools to implement a comprehensive HAI prevention program.

Healthcare Associated Infections Report

March 7th, 2011

Good news this time.  The number of bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients with central lines decreased by 58% over the last 10 years according to a new CDC Vital Signs report. This decrease saved 27,000 lives and $1.8B in excess health care costs. Bloodstream infections in patients with central lines can be deadly, killing as many as 1 in 4 patients who gets one.

Most hospital Infectious Disease Committees follow central line infections very closely these days. Back in the day (about 10-15 years ago), it was common practice to put in central lines at the bedside with only a pair of sterile gloves. Now most hospitals require full gowning, face mask, and cap, along with full sterile draping of the patient. This is even required now in many ORs for central lines put in patients right before surgery.

You can check out our website dedicated to preventing Healthcare Associated Infections.   We also help facilitate communication through the hospital association for facilities that are participating in the national collaborative “On the Cusp” to prevent blood stream infections.  Part of our strategic initiatives for 2011 is to help address blood stream infections in hemodialysis units so our prevention efforts will be extending beyond acute care hospitals.

By the way- a “central line” and a simple “IV” are different things.  Central lines are inserted into large veins  and are pretty big because they need to handle a large volume.  Simple IV’s usually go into veins.  IV’s have a much lower risk of infection.

Handwashing Report

March 3rd, 2011

A recent report in Surgery News found that a six-month “process improvement project” that added a simple hand-washing question to the daily ICU checklist decreased the rate of central line-associated bloodstream infections in a surgical ICU.

Infection Prevention in AZ

October 22nd, 2010

Healthcare-associated infections claim more lives in Arizona every year than auto accidents or influenza.  Surprised?  That’s why the Governor issued a proclamation making this week as Infection Prevention week in Arizona- providing us with an opportunity to call attention to one of the CDC’s Winnable Battles-  defeating Healthcare-Associated Infections.  We had a news conference (along with hospital partners) this week to talk about our statewide efforts reduce these unnecessary and preventable infections.  These infections don’t just claim lives, they’re real expensive too, on my blog in March, I talked about a study in the Annals of Internal Medicine outlining just how expensive these infections are.

New numbers from the just released 2009 Vital Statistics report talk about one of these infections called C.diff.  In 2009, about 2,500 Arizonans were hospitalized with intestinal inflammation from Clostridium difficile, a bacterial inflammation of the intestines. This disease is of growing public health concern because it is sometimes acquired in hospitals and other health care institutions with long-term patients as residents. In 2009, 161 Arizonans died from intestinal inflammation (enterocolitis) due to Clostridium difficile. Those 65 years or older accounted for about 90% of the deaths.

We’ve got to work smart to get rid of healthcare-associated infections, educating both providers and the public.  Our Licensing division works with all healthcare and long term care facilities to make sure they use best practices.  Some of the most effective interventions are the most simple and low-tech:  good hand washing by all healthcare professionals, doing a quick nasal swab before surgery and using a different cleanser on the skin before surgery.  Simple steps like these and a long term plan can make a difference in protecting those in hospitals.

We’re also working a different angle to educate the public; we are holding a contest asking the public to make a video to teach the rest of the folks and there’s a $500 prize (paid for by an association control specialists in the state). Even though staff and family can’t win, be sure to let your friends know – we really want a creative answer to teach the public.  More details are on our website:  preventHAIaz.org

Winnable Battle- Healthcare Acquired Infections

August 18th, 2010

Each year in the US there are 1.7 million health care associated infections that cause approximately 99,000 deaths in US hospitals.  There are lots of germs that can cause health care associated infections, but 16% are in the really bad category because they’re resistant to  antibiotics.  These multidrug-resistant organisms pose huge problems once they get started, which is why preventing their transmission in health care facilities so important. The germ that gets the most attention is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)- and preventing health care MRSA infections is one of our top public health goals in AZ.

A new study this week suggests that we may be making some headway.  A new study published in JAMA found that the rates of invasive health care associated MRSA infections decreased in recent years among patients with infections that began outside and inside hospitals.

We’ve developed a Healthcare-Associated Infection (HAI) and Antibiotic Resistance resource page to help healthcare providers to develop and implement better plans to reduce healthcare associated infections.  We’re also working in various ways through our medical and long term care licensing programs and our public health programs to keep making headway on this important CDC Winnable Battle.

5 “Winnable Public Health Battles” Infection Control

May 24th, 2010

I was in Atlanta a couple of weeks ago for new health officer orientation and was able to meet with Dr. Frieden (the new head of the CDC) a couple of times.  Each time that we met he referred to a general theme that the CDC will be using over the next 3 years to drive public health policy- it’s called Public Health’s “Winnable Battles”.  CDC will be increasingly  focusing its strategic planning on public health and policy interventions to help win the 5 “Winnable Battles”.  There’s not much on the CDC’s website yet on the new strategy- but moving forward you’re sure to hear about them.  I’ll introduce them to you this week:

1. Infection Control

This one is probably the most winnable “Winnable Battle” in the short run.  Healthcare-associated infections are  acquired when being treated for something else in a healthcare setting. They’re one of the top-10 leading causes of death in the US.  We’ve developed a Healthcare-Associated Infection (HAI) and Antibiotic Resistance resource page to help healthcare providers to develop and implement better plans to reduce healthcare associated infections.

Unlike the problems of teen pregnancy, smoking, and obesity- interventions to reduce healthcare acquired infections can have an impact even in the short run.  The CDC’s Infection Control website also has information to help providers do better in this area.