Posts Tagged ‘Serious Mental Illness’

Integrated Care Responses On Deck

January 8th, 2013

We all need to take care of both our physical and behavioral health needs in order to be healthy. The mind and body aren’t separated- and neither should the health-care delivery system- especially for folks with a serious mental illness. Folks with a serious mental illness die more than 25 years earlier than the general population… an unacceptable health disparity in anybody’s book. The increased mortality is largely from treatable medical conditions caused by modifiable risk factors like smoking, obesity, substance abuse, and not accessing primary and acute medical care. Population health issues. 

We recognized the need to address this unacceptable health disparity when we put together our Strategic Map and Plan that includes integrating behavioral and acute healthcare. It’s been a long haul and a lot of work- and we passed a major milestone today when folks submitted their bids on our Request For Proposal (otherwise known as RFP) for the delivery of behavioral health services in Maricopa County.  We received bids from: 1) Magellan Complete Care of Arizona, Inc.; 2) Cenpatico of Arizona LLC; 3) Arizona Physicians IPA, Inc. (APIPA), d/b/a UnitedHealthcare Community Plan, operating as UnitedHealthcare Whole Health; 4) Mercy Maricopa Integrated Care; and 5) Partners in Integrated Health, LLC. 

Our evaluation team will begin their analysis shortly…  and we expect the evaluation process to take 8 weeks or so.  The entity that ends up getting the contract will be responsible for delivering both preventative, acute and primary care along with Recovery-based behavioral health services for folks in the public behavioral health system in Maricopa County beginning on 10/1/13.  

It’s difficult to put into words how much work has gone into this solicitation. I know that many of you put this work on top of all your normal work, had put off other projects, and sacrificed some of your home-life for this product- and I just really want you to know that I appreciate it. It’s going to save lives. Stay tuned.

Integrating Physical & Behavioral Health Services to Save Lives

October 11th, 2012

We all need to take care of both our physical and behavioral health needs in order to be healthy. The mind and body aren’t separated- and neither should the health-care delivery system- especially for folks with a serious mental illness. Folks with a serious mental illness die more than 25 years earlier than the general population… an unacceptable health disparity in anybody’s book. The increased mortality is largely from treatable medical conditions caused by modifiable risk factors like smoking, obesity, substance abuse, and not accessing primary and acute medical care. 

We recognized the need to address this unacceptable health disparity when we put together our Strategic Map and Plan. It’s been a long haul and a lot of work- and we passed a major milestone this week when we released our Request For Proposal (otherwise known as RFP) for the delivery of behavioral health services in Maricopa County. The entity that ends up getting the contract will be responsible for delivering both preventative, acute and primary care along with Recovery-based behavioral health services for folks in the public behavioral health system in Maricopa County. The new contract is scheduled to start on 10/1/13. 

It’s difficult to put into words how much work has gone into this solicitation. I know that many of you put this work on top of all your normal work, had put off other projects, and sacrificed some of your home-life for this product- and I just really want you to know that I appreciate it. It’s going to save lives. You can check out the full solicitation on the State’s Procurement website hub- called ProcureAZ.

Watershed Week for Behavioral Health Services

May 17th, 2012

The Governor and I and the plaintiffs in the 1981 Arnold v. Sarn lawsuit signed a landmark agreement today which will last 2 years (pending the court’s approval).  Today’s agreement outlines objectives for supported care and services for folks with a serious mental illness.  Over the next couple of years we’ll work together with the plaintiffs to enhance Arizona’s behavioral health system with a focus on a Recovery model built on community supports like skill-building, self-management of health conditions, coaching, community-based peer and family support, employment, and community integration.  We’re also pleased that the new agreement incorporates national best-practice models and standards. 

Today’s agreement also ties into the additional $38.7M we received in the budget that was recently signed.  That funding is for community-based, recovery-oriented behavioral health services for folks with a serious mental illness that don’t qualify for Medicaid (AHCCCS).  Our next task is to build our investment plan for those funds- and that means getting solid Stakeholder input to help us make important advancements in our service delivery and to demonstrate Arizona’s commitment to using effective community-based services and supports that allow individuals with serious mental illnesses to live successfully in their own homes and communities. 

We’ll be hosting several stakeholder meetings next week to share our thoughts and hear ideas and proposed approaches on the best use for this funding.  Our meeting with our Tribal and Regional Behavioral Health Authority partners will be on next Tuesday and our meetings with behavioral health providers, including peer and family-run organizations that serve individuals with serious mental illnesses will be next Wednesday.  You can see more detail in Dr. Nelson’s Stakeholder Letter.

 

Inside the Governor’s Budget

January 25th, 2012

Dr. Nelson wrote a great blog this week that discusses the behavioral health aspects of the Governor’s

2012 State of the State Address which was followed by the release of her policy agenda called The Four Cornerstones of Reform: Centennial Edition.  Please visit Dr. Nelson’s blog for the details of the Governor’s remarks about behavioral health including information about the FY2013 Executive Budget which proposes almost $39M in additional funding be set aside for certain community-based services for folks struggling with a serious mental illness (who don’t qualify for Medicaid)…  for things like peer and family support, supported employment, supported housing, health promotion, and living skills training.  This is great (and welcome) news. 

There are a number of other elements related to our Agency budget proposal in the budget report- including a provision that would allow us to set appropriate fees for our newborn screening program, which has been running in the red for the last couple of years despite aggressive cost-cutting measures.

Sharpening the Axe

December 19th, 2011

There’s a well-known quote attributed to Abe Lincoln that goes something like this: “Give me 6 hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first 4 sharpening the axe.”  Maybe somebody will someday quote me as saying:  ”Give us 20 months to transform the delivery of behavioral health and primary care services to address the health disparities among folks with a serious mental illness and we’ll spend the first half partnering with stakeholders“.  OK, we’ll probably never be quoted like that- but you get the idea.  The more up front work we do with our partners during our behavioral health system transformation- the more likely we’ll be successful in the end.

Community Based Research:  The last few months have been very busy as we’ve gathered Stakeholder input on the various moving pieces that fit into our overall behavioral health integration project.  We’ve had several meetings, focus groups, and forums lately on the concept of integrated primary and psychiatric care.  The first series of the focus groups were in the Fall of 2010 and were designed to gather input from peer and family members (the Raise Your Voice effort).  This Fall we and AHCCCS coordinated an RFI and had in-person meetings with companies the get input about the feasibility of the integration effort.  Throughout December, we pressed ahead with a series of stakeholder meetings from the behavioral health provider community.  Our Behavioral Health shop, AHCCCS and St. Luke’s Health Initiative sponsored and coordinated a series of focus groups over the last couple of weeks to gather input regarding integrating behavioral health and physical healthcare- and St. Luke’s Health Initiative will be busy over the next couple of weeks putting together the data- which we’ll use as we design and implement Health Homes for folks with a serious mental illness.  

Licensing Efforts:  Our Licensing and Rules teams also just finished a series of forums with behavioral health providers to gather input about how we should put together a rulemaking package that will put a regulatory structure regarding the quality of care that’ll set the stage for integrating behavioral health and primary acute care from a licensing standpoint. We’re excited about this rulemaking because it supports our efforts to establish coordination and collaboration between all behavioral health and physical health providers.

We’ve developed a preliminary plan to facilitate integration of behavioral and physical health services and the just completed forums included a presentation that included highlights about the statutory framework; preliminary integration plans for health care institutions and behavioral health services; and a brief outline of the rulemaking process including formation of workgroups. During the forums we received constructive feedback and lots of questions- and more than 200 folks attended.  The feedback received was encouraging. Questions from the audience included:  What is the timeline for completing the rulemaking? In a rural setting, is integration and co-location the same? What about respite care? Can I be in a workgroup? If we don’t integrate, will we lose our license? What about CSAs? If we are integrated, will we have two surveyors- one for BH and one for PH? What about DUI screening? Now that the licensing forums are completed, we’ll proceed with putting together a “straw man” set of rules- followed by some roll-up-the-sleeves work groups (including licensees) to help us assemble a draft rule package.

Summary: We’re committed to strengthening the recovery based foundation that characterizes Arizona’s behavioral health system using this evidence-based practice called Community Based Participatory Research- which is used in public health research to engage the community in designing programs that are responsive to the public’s needs.

The ABC’s of Medicare

August 29th, 2011

By now you know all about our goal of improving integration of care for individuals with a serious mental illness.  In looking more closely at this population, we noticed that about 50% of folks with a serious mental illness who are enrolled with Medicaid (AHCCCS) are also enrolled in Medicare… meaning that they’re “dual eligible.” As part of our recent RFI (see above) regarding a Specialty RBHA with an SMI Health Home we mention that we’d like to explore having a behavioral health authority (RBHA) that’s also a Medicare Part C Special Needs Plan (SNP) because we think that’ll help with care coordination and lower our costs for dual eligible members.

So, what in the world is a Medicare SNP?  To understand a SNP you first need to know a little about Medicare- so here goes.  Medicare and Medicaid were established by the Social Security Act of 1965.  Most folks eligible for Medicare are over the age of 65 or have a disability and receive Social Security Disability Insurance.  The  federal government pays 100% of the costs for Medicare (in other words there is no state matching funds required). Medicare has different benefit packages called Medicare Part A, B, C, and D.

Part A includes coverage for inpatient hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and hospice care. Everyone enrolled in Medicare is automatically enrolled in Part A and they generally don’t have to pay premiums. Part B provides doctor services, X-rays, occupational therapy and many more medically necessary or preventive services typically provided outside of a hospital or clinic.  Part D was added in 2006 to add prescription drug coverage.

Medicare Part C was established in 1997. Part C Medicare Advantage Plans include both of the Part A and B benefits as well as additional optional benefits the Medicare Advantage Plan wants to offer like eyeglasses. These plans are private companies that are approved by Medicare.  Another type of Part C Plan is a Special Needs Plan… which is like a Medicare Advantage Plan but it’s designed to serve “dual eligibles” (people that qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid) and some people with certain severe and disabling chronic conditions.  A Special Needs Plan must include Part A, B, and D and can also provide other optional services.  Unlike other Medicare plans, this kind of plan coordinates benefits with Medicaid, creating individualized care plans for enrollees.

So, why all the fuss about “dual eligibles” as we craft our plan to better integrate behavioral and regular healthcare?  Two big reasons: lower state costs and better care coordination.   For a “dual eligible” (someone who qualifies for both Medicare and Medicaid) Medicare is the primary payer and is supposed to be billed first.  Remember, the federal government pays 100% of the costs for Medicare, while under Medicaid (read AHCCCS) the state has to pay a chunk of the costs.  Also, Medicare Special Needs Plans coordinate benefits with Medicaid and create individualized care plans for enrollees- which helps with care coordination and results in better outcomes.

So… you can see the potential advantages if our future behavioral health authorities included a Medicare Part C Special Needs Plan because we’d be able to improve care coordination and reduce state costs by making sure that the fed’s pick up the bill (through Medicare) for folks that are “dual eligible”.

State Comparison of Substance Abuse and Behavioral Health

August 10th, 2011

A new report is out that provides a state-by-state comparison of a wide range of behavioral health issues. Every state has to deal with some significant challenges with mental illness and substance abuse.  For example, among people 12 and older, Alaska’s current illicit drug use rate more than double that in Iowa (13% versus 5%), yet Iowa was among the top 10 states when it came to binge drinking (28%).

 The report was developed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and provides valuable insight to state public health authorities and service providers on the scope and type of behavioral health issues affecting their states. The report uses the combined 2008 and 2009 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH ), which is drawn from interviews with more than 100,000 persons from around the country, and provides a state-by-state breakdown along 25 different measures of substance abuse and mental health problems, including illicit drug use, binge drinking, alcohol and illicit drug dependence, tobacco use, serious mental illness, and major depressive episode. Other notable findings include:

  • Fewer people in many states perceived that cigarette use can be risky. Between the combined years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 the perception of great risk from smoking one or more pack of cigarettes a day decreased in 14 states among those aged 12 to 17; in 31 states among those aged 18 to 25 and in 9 states among those 26 and older.
  • Current illicit drug use dropped among adolescents aged 12 to 17 in 17 states between 2002-2003 and 2008-2009; no increases in current illicit drug use occurred in any state in this age group over this time period.
  • While the District of Columbia had the nation’s highest rate of past year alcohol dependence or abuse for those 26 or older (8.1%), it had the lowest rate among persons aged 12 to 17 (3.0%).
  • Utah had the lowest rate of current marijuana use (3.6%) while Alaska had the highest rate (11.5%).
  • Between 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 11 states showed declines in past year cocaine use among persons aged 12 or older (in alphabetical order — Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Ohio, Oregon, Tennessee and Virginia).
  • Rhode Island had the nation’s highest rate of adults aged 18 or older experiencing serious mental illness in the past year (7.2%), while Hawaii and South Dakota shared the lowest rate (3.5%)

Step Up to the Plate

July 15th, 2011

It’s time to step up to the plate if you’re interested in providing clear and concise information about how best to integrate primary and acute healthcare with behavioral health care for folks with serious mental illnesses in Arizona.  One of our top priorities in behavioral health over the coming years will be to better integrate physical health and mental health/substance abuse services in Arizona.  Why is this a priority you ask?  It’s because folks with the most serious mental illnesses die at least 25-30 years earlier than the average Arizonan.  Physical and mental illnesses are often linked- and when left untreated, folks can experience lost productivity, unsuccessful relationships, significant distress and dysfunction; it can also affect how well they care for their kids.  You can check out several recent blog posts on this topic for more information about where we’ve been and where we’re going.

 One of the ideas that our interagency integration steering committee has been exploring over the last several weeks is shifting to a service model that includes contracting with managed care organization(s) to serve as a Specialty Regional Behavioral Health Authority that would also include a health home for folks with serious mental illness.  The initial idea includes the potential for moving ahead with this new model as we implement the next major behavioral health contract in Maricopa County beginning October 1, 2013.

 The team is inviting interested folks and organizations to provide concise input over the next few weeks by replying to our newly released Request for Information.  In addition, our team has put together a nifty integration website that provides a cornucopia of data and information about integrating primary and acute healthcare with behavioral health care.  On the main page, you can click on the icon for the Specialty RBHA and follow along as work continues on the health home planning grant and the research into a Specialty RBHA.  Additional Stakeholder input will be getting underway in the coming weeks and months as well.

Behavioral Health Services in Maricopa County

June 12th, 2011

We recently extended our contract with the Regional Behavioral Health Authority in Maricopa County through September 30, 2013.  We authorized the contract extension (which will be the 6th year of the contract) so that we can better serve our members and families while we hammer out the details of several new initiatives designed to improve the quality of the services that we provide in the behavioral health system.  Several large-scale initiatives are just getting underway and we have important details to iron out before we put out the next contract Request For Proposal (technically called the Maricopa County RFP).

For example, you’ve heard me talking about our commitment to improve health and wellness for folks with serious mental illnesses by better integrating psychiatric and physical healthcare.  To move forward, we’ve (ADHS and AHCCCS) applied for and received a Health Homes Planning Grant to plan for implementation of health homes for adults with serious mental illness.  There’ll undoubtedly need to be significant changes to the RFP based on the outcomes of this work, and this extra year will give us an opportunity to include results of the planning grant in that next RFP.

In addition, because of the current (and continuing) budget crisis, the parties in Arnold v. Sarn agreed to stay the court orders until June 30, 2012.  During the stay, we all agreed to negotiate revised court orders.  Over the past several months, we’ve been conducting dozens of focus groups with adults with serious mental illness to help inform and set priorities for the new court orders.  Our negotiations will take place this summer and they’ll most likely continue into 2012.  The framework for the new court orders will also help shape the language in the new RFP.  Lastly, there are some significant Medicaid reforms proposed (or already being implemented) for Arizona, as outlined in the Fiscal Year 12 budget that will potentially have an impact for the next RFP.

The bottom line is that this extension will allow us to issue a thorough, well-researched and comprehensive RFP so we can achieve our ultimate performance objectives of integrating care and incorporating new court orders while maintaining continuity of care and preventing a disruption in services. The agreement we signed outlines other initiatives impacting this decision to extend the current contract and indicates that we’ll be carefully evaluating the progress on the Health Homes Planning Grant.

Health Homes Planning Grant Approved

April 5th, 2011

Last week I wrote about how we and AHCCCS applied for a Health Homes Planning Grant from the US Dept. of Health & Human Services to improve the health status of folks with serious mental illnesses by improving case management, care coordination, health promotion, transitional care, individual and family support, referral to necessary services, and the use of health information technology.  HHS approved the grant request this week.  In the coming months, we will work closely with AHCCCS and our community stakeholders to plan for and pursue integrated health homes for the SMI population across the state.  By improving coordination of care and increasing access to primary care and prevention services, we expect to see meaningful improvements in quality of life and health status.  This is a very exciting opportunity that can result in significant health gains for a vulnerable population in Arizona.